Helios 44 2 vs 44 4

By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Cookie PolicyPrivacy Policyand our Terms of Service. Photography Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional, enthusiast and amateur photographers.

It only takes a minute to sign up. I'm primarily buying this lens for portraits due to the interesting swirly bokeh effect it produces. There seem to be multiple versions of this lens - 44, and and I'm confused about which one is the sharpest and has the "swirliest" bokeh.

I've also searched around on Google, but there seem to be conflicting opinions this regard. In some cases I've read that the newer versionsare sharper but have lesser swirly bokeh effect as it was considered a flaw. It differs little from the series including the price. Returning to the series. It should be divided into two sections at least : 1. Some sites report that and differ only in design frames, 44M-4 and 44M-5 as well.

It may be added that characteristics of the specific copies of the same model may differ quite strongly in mind the age and features of soviet-made. It is 44 and that are legendary. I have Helios I'm sequoiagrove and it is very nice. However, I must say that as a Nikon user you have the wrong camera for vintage lenses.

Subscribe to RSS

You can only use them for macro, otherwise, to focus infinity you need a bad adapter with a cheap not-fit-for-photography lens in it. I know this is a bit late to answer your question, but I do so in case someone else happen ask the same thing. Here is a link where you can find out more about the Helios 44 lenses in general. Make sure you scroll down and also read the comments following the list of lenses. Sign up to join this community.

The best answers are voted up and rise to the top. Home Questions Tags Users Unanswered.A lot has been written about the many versions of the Helios 44 lens. Many of them are M42 mount, allowing them to be used on many different types and brands of cameras, including the most recent crop of mirrorless bodies.

It is a Soviet-era copy of the well-regarded Zeiss Biotar lens formula. These lenses were manufactured between the late s through the early s. They were made at different manufacturing plants over that time, and there are several iterative versions. The original 44 was followed by the, 44M, 44M-4, and a slew of others.

They are all basically the same optics, but with different mechanical specifications aperture blades, preset vs auto aperture, focusing distance, etc. Some were multi-coated, others not. Many of the 44 variations have manufacturer symbols or codes printed on the front lens area just below the filter threads. The collector community lore is that the earlier the lens was made, the swirlier the bokeh. But early lenses also suffered from poorer optics and more frequent mechanical failures according to collectors.

The is one of the most prolific models available today. The 44M and 44M-4 are also very popular and widely available on ebay and even Amazon. Your testing may yield different results. And there are at least 10 other versions of this lens you could potentially find on the market at any given time.

Click here for additional sample images showing a comparison at different f-stops. Skip to content.Remember Me? Forgot Password. The Latest. Pentax Stores Pentax Retailer Map. Go to Page Photos: Gallery. Posts: 8. Long story short, I bought one of these on a whim. I meant to get the swirly-bokeh-dream that is the Heliosbut didn't realize the difference and ended up with a 44M Posts: 2, You also need the right background for the swirl to get really noticeable.

Try some different shots. The Helios lenses are just all-around fun, even without the swirl. It is still a fun lens, and I'm still figuring out how best to use it. I'm going to Sicily in 4 weeks, and trying to travel light, so I've been trying to decide which lenses go, and which stay! I shot this a little earlier, and am pretty pleased with the result. Last edited by amandarenee; at PM. These users Like amandarenee's post:.

Posts: Generally, the older the Helios the more swirl you get under the right conditions. Go for a 44 or athere are millions of them and they are very cheap. Photos: Albums.

Which Helios 44 for best swirly bokeh?

Posts: 4, I have a K4, which is the same as the M4, only in K mount. It swirls ok, even on APS-C, you just need to know ho to produce it. BTW be aware that there's a significant variance between samples of even the same models so no guarantees here.

Best swirl you get, as you said, wide open, with the subject relatively close, and a busy background a little further away. Grass, the highlights among the foliage of a tree, the many lights of Christmas decorations are good examples of what works well in order to produce the "swirl". Photos: Gallery Albums. Originally posted by amandarenee. Copy of 44K-4 I have is swirly. Someone mentioned that 44 series lenses get significantly more swirly if you turn front element over.

Not sure how true this is tough. Originally posted by sawitar. BTW, it might happen, that reversed glass will touch the elements bellow, but that is the price for this SFX adaptation and considering the price of HeliosI think you can live with it. In the worst case scenario, your adaptation might be permanent.I bought the M42 screwmount version hence the 44m namesince I have that adapter, but they made it available in many other mounts.

helios 44 2 vs 44 4

The reason for buying this lens was one thing, and one thing only: The swirley bokeh effect! What really surprised me though, was all the other scenarios this lens was good for!

And it does amazing with black and white photography. The lens is built like a tank! My copy is very smooth in the focus ring, and the aperture ring has nice clicks.

A good condition lens. For black and white street photography the lens is really great. It does have a little glow at the highlights in bright sunshine, but that only adds to the charm. The contrast needs to be upped in post-processing, since I find the OOC files to be a little lacking in that area.

Helios 44 Lens Review 2019

Micro-contrast on the other hand is great. The optimal background is sunlit foliage. Stopped down it is not as sharp as the Takumars or the Fujinons. The Bokeh on this lens is amazing. It can get harsh when you want it to foliage background but for street use with regular busy backgrounds the bokeh is fantastic. No need for me to ramble on. This lens is an amzing lens, and I highly recommend it to anyone with an X-series lens system.

Below is my typical review shots. Shot in many situations. Mostly street. But for this lens, also alot of nature shots. For the most sunlit days I mounted a 3-stop ND filter. There is a film-like quality to them that is gorgeous and the bokeh is nothing short of stellar. Great job, once again. Very cryptic origins indeed…. Regards from Paris, Guillaume. It was very intersting to read this note.Well, the Helios is a copy of the Carl Zeiss Biotar 58mm.

A few crafty guys went into the Zeiss factory and stole the Biotar formula. The Biotar formula creates a swirling bokeh that is just stunning. You really need to stop this lens down a bit. Shooting wide open get you a very dreamy image. Stopping down to f4 or lower sharpens up the lens nicely.

It has 8 aperture blades. Helios 58mm is really sought after by the more experimental photographers and cinematographers. It gives your footage an instant vintage look.

Helios 44-3 58mm f2.0 MC vs. Helios 44M-6 58mm f2.0 MC

The sharper the camera sensor the better this lens performs. It also creates stunning flares. The extra stop does magic on this vintage baby. The lens was manufactured mostly in an M42 mount to be used with the Zenit camera but it was also made in a Pentax K and M39 mount as well.

It has a 52mm filter thread. I use an inexpensive step-up ring to get it to my filter size of 77mm. If you are serious about adding one of these babies to your collection I would buy of them yes, they are that cheaptest them all, then you can pick the winner and sell the rest. This is how Stanley Kubrick chose his lenses. I absolutely love this lens and you will get unique and beautiful images out of the Helios I own the Helios 44M, which is built a bit more solid and weighs more but the optically the same as the We want buying and selling quality glass to be easy and affordable.

Great glass helps inspire great images and we look forward to serving this incredible community of creators by offering a place to get the tools for your next great project. Or post to your blog and anywhere else you feel it would be a good fit. Save Save.Helios 44 58mm f2 is one of the best known Soviet vintage lenses.

Production started after World War II and continued for half a century, until the s. The lens is quite popular today because of its distinct image rendering, availability, and price. Both design and optics-wise, the Helios 44 is a copy of the prewar Carl Zeiss Biotar with which it shares the same focal length and maximum aperture. It was initially produced in the M39 mount and then became one of the first lenses to be made for the M42 mount.

Some Helios 44 lenses were also sold on Soviet Start cameras, which had a bayonet mount. During its long production span, the Helios 44 has had numerous variations. While the focal length and maximum aperture remained the same, improvements and changes were made in terms of resolution, coating layers and body style. While variations in terms of glass quality are open to debate, reliability in Helios 44 remained strong throughout the years. This first version of the lens really looks old school with its silver-like shining chrome body.

It has a 13 blade aperture with preset aperture control, the maximum opening is f2 and the minimum is f The minimal focusing distance is 0. The lens uses a 49mm filter. Some really old Helios 44 lenses, such as the one presented here, do not have the typical Soviet serial number where the first two letters indicate the production year.

Also, the glass has a purple tint, which is somehow atypical for a non-coated or single-coated lens. This is probably the most sought of version of the Helios 44 series. Probably, this early version was also the most successful of them all in terms of numbers. Back then, Helios was the standard lens on Zenit film cameras and the two products were sold in large numbers, especially in Eastern Europe.

The other famous kit of the time was the Praktica film camera, which was equipped with the Pentacon 50mm lens. The lens impresses with its simplicity in both design and construction, but it is sturdy and reliable. It was one of the last preset aperture control lenses to have been in production during the s. The most important fact is that Helios has its own personality in terms of color reproduction and bokeh. Bokeh is very nice and the lens still retains the sharpness of the Biotar, especially when kept in the f3.

In terms of body style, the silvered chrome was replaced with black metal, as it was the case with almost all vintage lenses starting with the late s. The number of blades was also reduced from 13 to only 6 or 8. Focusing is done by a ring closer to the mount, which may not be the best system in terms of ergonomics, but it is better than the one found in the Mir 1, for example. As it was previously said, some users signaled that quality may vary.

Figures based on the web resources from Zenit indicate that the Helios has better resolution than the Helios This is a rarer version of the lens which has the same specifications as the Helios early but has a different body style. It is probably one of the last of the Helios Helios 44M marked a big change in the design of the older Helios 44 lens, despite the fact that the optical formula of the lens remained the same. From the s, the two designs remained in parallel production until the very end.

The new Helios 44M changes the aperture control and place completely, marking the transition from the old preset system to the new modern ring style. The new diaphragm control has now an Auto and Manual switch, which indicates that the lens can be used on automatic preset control or on fully manual control. Until the multicoated versions, resolution remained almost the same, but the light coefficient transmission was improved.

In total, there were 8 versions until the end of production. Multicoating was introduced and while changes in design were minimal, the raw performance was increased. As figures from Zenit indicate, both resolution and light coefficient transmission were vastly improved. Also, another color scheme came the with MC versions, which marked the departure from all previous versions.I plan to use the Helios on Fuji X-T1. Seemingly the more the Soviet engineers worked to improve the sharpness of the Helios 44 the less swirly bokeh it would produce.

Go for the earliest versions, Helios 44 to Helios I don't have any AF lenses, so if I want a picture, I have to do more than squeeze a button.

helios 44 2 vs 44 4

The would probably be the most readily available and will give you the swirly bokeh you're looking for. I'd recommend the orginal Helios 44 with 13 aperture blades if you think you're ever going to stop down.

helios 44 2 vs 44 4

The and 44M have 8 blades and all other versions have 6 blades which can give 'ugly' polygons in certain conditions - no such problems with the early On the other hand, the oldest lenses may have their own issues more likely to have mechanical problems, they use M39 mount which needs an adapter ring to M42 etc so the is probably the best compromise.

There are plenty of out there and the one I have has no problems giving me some swirly love. I have a waiting for me in the UK and a on delivery via Ebay from Moscow but I suspect that will be a fake and probably another If you are buying on ebay do your research and only buy good ones. There are so many other there and they're so cheap that I wouldn't take anything dodgy unlike me.

Not sure where you're based but there are plenty on UK eBay who will ship international. The Zenit camera which bore this lens range was popular in the UK in the 70's - more so than the US, and thus there are plenty to choose from.

I once owned a Helios but sold it before experimenting sufficiently with it. I would like to try a Helios 44 again to achieve swirly bokeh but I am confused by the number of versions available cheaply on eBay.

General rule is: the older the Helios, the most swirly character. However, you can get super swirly effect by simple modification, best described here.

I appreciate all the good suggestions. I can either keep them all or resell one or two of them. I'm thinking of pulling the optics out of a good and sticking them in this body to get the 13 blade iris.

My best is made by KMZ. My Helios 44 doesn't have the red P but has a very light, barely perceptible coating. Serial no. It has an aperture from and was made by KMZ - I think all my Helios lenses were from the KMZ factory although it's not obvious on the later lenses. Do you have a photo of your one? Helios KMZ Helios 44M KMZ Helios 44M-4 KMZ Yes the first glass element is what I know as the object lens.

Fujifilm X-T10 + Helios 44-M 58mm f2 Review (M42 Vintage Lens)

Not entirely sure why we call it that.